

In 1897, a disease was noted in Africa by Sir Albert Cook that is most likely to have been Buruli ulcer. Between 1923-35 the condition was also observed by Kleinsmidt in north-east Congo. The disease was seen in 1940 and subsequently (1948) described by MacCallum in Australia as Bairnsdale ulcer. Afterwards similar ulcers were found in Africa, Papua New Guinea and other parts of the world. In 1961 a focus was discovered in Uganda along the White Nile in Buruli County near Lake Kyoga, hence the name Buruli ulcer which has since been used extensively. After 1980, important new foci were discovered in West Africa. Since December 1997, the condition has been recognised by the WHO as an important emerging disease. The "Global Buruli Ulcer Initiative" was launched in February 1998 with the intention of improving knowledge and control of this disease.
The geographical range of the disease is still incompletely known. In the year 2000, the condition was known to occur in:

Buruli ulcer is caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, an organism that is closely related to M. tuberculosis. These bacteria are acid-fast rods, 3-7 m m long. The generation time is 20 hours (slow-growing organism). The reservoir and the route of transmission remain unknown. Regular reference is made to the presence of the disease in marshy areas along large rivers. M. ulcerans grows best at low oxygen concentrations, such as are found in the mud of marshy ground. The anamnesis often includes a report of minor trauma, an insect bite or a hypodermic injection at the site of the original solitary lesion. It is suspected that transmission might occur via the bite of infected water bugs (Naucoris sp. and Diplonychus sp., belonging to the family of Naucoridae and Belostomatidae [Gr. "belos" = needle, "stoma" = mouth]), respectively. These insects are possibly infected by filter feeding on micro-organisms in the water, subsequently serving as mechanical vectors. This however is still only a hypothesis. The mycobacteria are detectable in those insects by PCR. To date, attempts to isolate the organism from the environment (e.g. streambeds of slow-flowing rivers or marshes) have failed. The interval between sampling and culture, the transport media, the temperature and the aggressive decontamination procedures that are used possibly play a part in this. In nature, koalas and opossums can be infected. However, it cannot be established that Buruli ulcer is a zoonosis. To date, no human-to-human transmission has been demonstrated, although this cannot be excluded. Buruli ulcer is not an opportunistic infection in HIV patients.

*
The tissue necrosis extends further than the colonies of acid-fast rods. Following injection in experimental animals, a sterile ultrafiltrate of M. ulcerans can cause lesions that are very similar to Buruli ulcers. A cytotoxic necrotic toxin that is responsible for the steatonecrosis is found in the culture medium of M. ulcerans. This substance probably also has a bacteriostatic effect, which would explain the rarity of secondary infection. The toxin is a polyketide macrolide: mycolactone (C44H70O9). M. ulcerans strains that produce no mycolactone are avirulent to guinea pigs. Mycolactone is probably locally immunosuppressant. The important role of mycolactone in Buruli ulcers raises questions about similar substances in other mycobacteria. Genes that are involved in polyketide synthesis are found in M. tuberculosis and M. leprae. Further investigation is necessary to establish their function. M. ulcerans also contains phospholipases C and D, which possibly contribute to the virulence of the organism. Whether these lipolytic enzymes play a role in the steatonecrosis and tissue destruction is currently under study.

It is estimated that the incubation time is 6 weeks or longer. The ulcers are found in particular on the limbs, more above the elbow and knees, but in 10% of cases also on the trunk and the abdominal wall and rarely on the face or scalp.
*
The disease course can be divided into 4 stages: nodule, cellulitis, ulceration, scar. Sometimes the disease begins as an extensive and rapidly progressing, slightly painful and oedematous swelling of the subcutaneous tissue over which the skin is taut. More often, it begins as a pruritic, painless or slightly painful subcutaneous swelling that gradually becomes attached to the skin. A papulonecrotic or vesicular lesion then appears on the skin that progresses to an open ulcer with a gelatin-like coating. The skin around the ulcer is dark, sometimes with slight desquamation or with a deep reddish purple colour (Caucasians) or hyperpigmentation (darker skin). The edges are slightly raised and rolled. The undermining of the wound edges can be established by probing. Satellite lesions and metastatic lesions in the skin or bone sometimes occur. In addition, there can be numerous lesions at the time of the first examination. The presence of locally enlarged lymph nodes, however, is a sign of secondary infection rather than an actual characteristic of the disease. The general state of health remains excellent, without fever or malaise, irrespective of how extensive the ulcer is. There may be moderate leukocytosis.
*
When the ulcer is finally formed, it remains or becomes painless unless a secondary infection is involved. At the deeper level, muscle, bone and joint tissue are destroyed with the accompanying formation of sequesters. Calcifications can be detected radiologically:
In the long-term, after months or years, the ulcer tends to heal, but extensive deformities, ankylosis or lymphoedema remain. The scars are reminiscent of old burns or the consequences of late treponematoses.
***
A clinical classification may be used:
Class 1: Non-ulcerative
*
Class 2: Ulcerative
*
Class 3: Post-ulcerative
3.1: Scars without sequelae
3.2: Scars with sequelae such as contracture, amputation, organ loss
3.3: Mixed

The diagnosis of the ulcerative form is somewhat easier that that of the non-ulcerative form. The undermining of the wound edges is a characteristic of Buruli ulcer. Radiologically, subcutaneous fat calcifications and/or osteomyelitis are observed in a large percentage of patients.
*
The acid-fast rods are examined with Ziehl stain in smears of curettage products from the edges of the ulcer (preferably from the underside of the skin edges and not from the centre of the ulcer). The Ziehl stain of a smear demonstrates bacilli in ± 75% of cases. The histological features on biopsy are characteristic on condition that the sample has been taken sufficiently deeply to include the necrotic fatty tissue. Punch biopsies are usually not sufficient. There is no serodiagnosis. Culture is possible but slow (several months). The organism grows optimally at 32°C. Higher temperatures inhibit the organism (important when transporting). The organism cannot be frozen although storage at 4°C is possible. Löwenstein-Jensen medium is best used as a culture medium in an atmosphere with little oxygen. There are a few other non-tuberculous mycobacteria that can cause abscesses and ulcers, e.g. Mycobacterium avium intracellulare in AIDS patients, as well as M. szulgai, M. terrae, M. fortuitum, M. chelonae, M. malmoense and M. xenopi. Mycobacterium abscessus is a fast-growing organism that can cause tissue necrosis after accidental contamination of a deep inoculation (injection).
*
Infection induces cross sensitivity with tuberculin. It is possible that the opposite is also true and that tuberculosis provides partial protection against Mycobacterium ulcerans. Patients with active lesions often have no local skin reaction after injection of M. ulcerans antigen (burulin). After recovery, however, they test positive (cell immunity).
*
There are various PCR methods for detecting M. ulcerans but the technique is expensive and only available in a few places. False positive results can be reduced by developing a meticulous technique. False negatives (e.g. as a result of the presence of PCR inhibitors) are detected by carrying out simultaneous controls with known positive samples.


The prognosis is unfavourable because of the severe skin and bone lesions, scars, tendency to infectious metastases and the problems of surgical treatment. Many lesions heal spontaneously, although with severe sequelae.

Drug treatment is disappointing. In vitro M. ulcerans is susceptible to rifampicin, clarithromycin, amikacin and streptomycin. Cycloserine, DDS and clofazimine are active, but the organism is resistant to INH. Clinical results however are disappointing, possibly because the antibiotics do not diffuse to the bacillus itself. Treatment therefore is principally surgical: extensive resection of the tissue with curettage, followed by immobilisation in a functional position. In most cases, excision of the tissues is carried out under broad-spectrum antibiotic cover. The previously mentioned antimycobacterial antibiotics can be administered at the same time to prevent the emergence of metastatic lesions. After the formation of healthy granulation tissue, skin transplants are applied (split skin grafts). Amputation may sometimes be the only possible treatment. Tetanus vaccination should not be overlooked. Good results can be obtained with local thermotherapy by surrounding the ulcer with water bottles at 40°C. This can, however, cause logistical and technical problems. Healing of ulcers is obtained after an average of 41 days. There is little experience with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Intensive physiotherapy can improve the function of a mutilated limb.

In two studies in Uganda, BCG vaccination was shown to have about 50% efficacy against M. ulcerans. Protection nevertheless was temporary, on average lasting only a year. The ulcers that developed in vaccinated patients were smaller than those in controls. Possibly this merely involves non-specific immunostimulation by BCG.
